Letter: Ph.D. oral examinations in The Stanford Report

Nov. 15, 2012, 10:55 p.m.

Having returned to Stanford after a lengthy stint in industry, I am struck by the dearth of (currently optional) public notices for University Ph.D. oral examinations appearing in the Stanford Report. This is quite unfortunate for a number of reasons.  As a STEM field researcher, I am all too aware of how important the “white space” between traditional disciplines and departments is to advancing science and technology.

As a pre-major advisor, I encourage my advisees to attend Ph.D. orals (with me) so that they can get an understanding of what are the current frontiers in an area of possible career interest and a clear idea of what studies and training they might need to go down such a path.

And, irrespective of the field of discipline, orals provide a compact exposure to a wide range of subjects that can make one a more informed citizen. I hope these justifications may serve as a clarion call to all University departments to resume routine publication of Ph.D. oral schedules in the Stanford Report.

Sincerely,

Stewart A. Levin

Consulting Associate Faculty, Department of Geophysics

 

The Daily is committed to publishing a diversity of op-eds and letters to the editor. We’d love to hear your thoughts. Email letters to the editor to eic ‘at’ stanforddaily.com and op-ed submissions to opinions ‘at’ stanforddaily.com.

Login or create an account

Apply to The Daily’s High School Winter Program

Applications Due NOVEMBER 22

Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds